From scientists to artists, clouds have always enchanted us

May Be Interested In:Gus backs Des to fix the Titans’ problems


NATURE
Clouds: How to Identify Nature’s Most Fleeting Forms
Edward Grahams
Princeton University Press, $49.95

The glare of the city lights prevents most of us from seeing the night sky in its illuminated glory, though in the daytime anyone can look up and behold the epic, evanescent wonder that is the cloudscape. This fascinating book not only identifies types of clouds and explains how they form and disperse, but also reminds us of the close historical connection between art and science in capturing natural phenomena.

While the modern science of meteorology began during the Enlightenment, it was painters who took a lead in the serious appreciation of clouds, not simply including clouds in the picture but also selecting and arranging them to provide directional force as part of the composition of the painting, and thus leading the viewer’s eye through the artwork. Among their many aesthetic properties, clouds are, in atmospheric scientist Edward Graham’s neat phrase, scatterers of light.

Graham’s book includes many examples of the renowned artists who have portrayed clouds in ways that are highly personalised yet true to nature. In his art, Vincent van Gogh famously projected his often-troubled mind onto everything he painted, yet managed to render clouds in ways that correspond to objective categories such as we see in photographs in addition to being the agitated swirls of his Post-Impressionist vision.

In one painting,Wheat Field with Cypresses (1889), Graham discerns “a mixture of mamma, asperitas, hints of fluctus”, suggesting the artist “sees the wind and its turbulent motions”.

Detail from Van Gogh’s 1889 painting,  <i>Wheat Field with Cypresses</i>.

Detail from Van Gogh’s 1889 painting, Wheat Field with Cypresses.

Shakespeare referred to clouds as “airy nothings”, and even now, the true nature of clouds remains somewhat elusive. “The reality of the matter,” according to Graham, “is that although we know what a cloud is, there is no precise scientific definition of a cloud. This is because it is impossible to say – with the exact deterministic precision required of science – when a cluster of cloud droplets or ice crystals has become dense enough to constitute the rather nebulous term, ‘cloud’.” The vast majority of clouds appear to simply move across the sky – Graham points out that “most clouds never rain”.

Loading

Clouds are immense yet transitory, seemingly weightless yet inevitably falling down due to the force of gravity. They are shapeshifting apparitions that are never exactly the same as any other. “Clouds are always mutating and evolving in the sky,” writes Graham.

share Share facebook pinterest whatsapp x print

Similar Content

A rectangular satellite dish sitting on the ground outdoors.
A year after ditching waitlist, Starlink says it is “sold out” in parts of US
When was the famous ‘pink mansion’ built? Take the Brisbane Times quiz
When was the famous ‘pink mansion’ built? Take the Brisbane Times quiz
Designed for big ideas: The new building at Barangaroo where size isn’t everything
Designed for big ideas: The new building at Barangaroo where size isn’t everything
Brand power: How a new generation of AFL stars are making big bucks off the field
Brand power: How a new generation of AFL stars are making big bucks off the field
Donald Trump’s dumb war just got much, much dumber
Donald Trump’s dumb war just got much, much dumber
How do climate scientists maintain their hope in a warming world?
How do climate scientists maintain their hope in a warming world?
World Alert: News that Changes the Game | © 2025 | Daily News